anonymous

Daily Decision Recap: Reporting a Past Due Status on a Closed Account Does Not Violate the FCRA

A summary of recent top FCRA, TCPA and FDCPA cases from ACA. Editor’s note: This article is available for members only.

01/28/2022 1:00 P.M.

4 minute read

Each week, ACA International’s compliance team covers relevant case summaries for ACA members. Members may also submit cases for consideration to our compliance team at [email protected].

Here are the cases covered January 25 – 28:

January 25

Gartner v. AR Solutions: State Court Grants Summary Judgment for Collector on FDCPA Claims

Court found consumer could not recover damages for alleged violations of the FDCPA from a collector because a preponderance of evidence showed the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the collector’s maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such error.

Continue reading the summary here.

Wolf v. Carpenter Hazlewood Delgado & Bolen: Law Firm Had Permissible Purpose to Access Consumer’s Credit Report

An Arizona district court found that the collection of unpaid homeowner’s association assessments provided a permissible purpose under the FCRA for a law firm to access a consumer’s credit report.

Continue reading the summary here.

Alexander v. Carrington Mortg.: 4th Circuit Reverses District Court’s Decision on Convenience Fees

The defendant was accused of violating the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act by charging $5 in convenience fees to borrowers who paid monthly mortgage bills online or by phone. The case was dismissed in district court. On appeal the 4th Circuit found that, because the debt collector charged an amount that was not permitted by law, the consumers can proceed with some (but not all) of their claims.

Continue reading the summary here.

 

January 26

Soto v. Financial Recovery Services: No Standing for Letter Vendor Claims

In a Hunstein-styled letter vendor case, a New York district court granted a consumer’s motion to remand his FDCPA claims to state court on the basis that he lacked Article III standing.

Continue reading the summary here.

Lee v. Rausch: Court Remands FDCPA Action Due to Lack of Standing

The court found the consumer’s claims of possible harm arising from confusion about whether there was meaningful attorney involvement failed to plead a concrete injury in fact, and so the court remanded the case.

Continue reading the summary here.

Uvaldo v. Germaine L. Off.: Consumer Had Standing, But Most Claims Dismissed

The consumer was sued on a deficiency balance for a repossessed vehicle. The debt was reduced to judgment. The consumer sued the debt collector for violating the FDCPA, but the debt collector claimed the consumer did not have standing.

Continue reading the summary here.

 

January 27

Hustedt v. Hunter Warfield: Federal Court Remands FDCPA Claims to State Court

After finding a consumer’s complaint raising FDCPA claims lacked allegations of concrete harm necessary to trigger Article III standing and federal jurisdiction, the court questioned whether, upon remand, the state court might compel the consumer to amend her complaint to make her injury allegations plain, thereby enabling the collector to again remove the action to federal court.

Continue reading the summary here.

Jackson v. First Financial: Excluding Name of Original Creditor on Complaint Not

Access to this page is restricted.

Please log in. If "Remember me" is active, please continue and log in without re-entering your credentials.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more information. You may change your preferences on how cookies are stored by reviewing the settings on your browser.

The content on this site is presented for educational, general reference, and informational purposes only; is not intended to serve as legal or other advice; is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area; and should not replace the advice of your own legal counsel. By continuing to use our site, you are agreeing to the legal disclaimers in our Terms of Use. Review our Terms of Use for more information.

Friendly Reminder

Get continued access to ACA International’s wide array of resources, which can help you become more profitable, compliant and successful.

Renew your membership today to take advantage of tools you won’t find anywhere else:

  • Discounts on seminars, products, services and events
  • Resources to strengthen your compliance department
  • Industry-specific risk management products and services
  • Participation in ACA’s online community, The Hub
    Members-only website content
  • Professional development and training opportunities, and so much more!

If you have completed your renewal, please disregard this reminder.