A New York district court found that a plaintiff did not have Article III standing regarding his claim of an incorrect collection amount because he did not rely on the alleged misrepresentation, nor could he show a potential risk of future harm.
10/26/2022 3:15 P.M.
4.5 minute read
Rosenberg v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc., No. 21-CV-2199 (MKB),
Access to this page is restricted.
Please log in.