A Pennsylvania district court dismissed a pro se consumer’s FDCPA claims against a repossession agency because the repossession agent had a present right to take possession of the vehicle due to the consumer’s breach of contract.
06/28/2022 4:30 P.M.
4.5 minute read
Ishmael v. GM Fin. Inc., No. 2:22-CV-1095-JDW, 2022 WL 2073821 (E.D. Pa.
Access to this page is restricted.
Please log in.