A North Carolina district court found that a consumer had standing to bring his claims alleging that a debt collector violated the FDCPA when it provided his information to a third-party letter vendor. 09/28/2022 2:45 P.M. 2.5 minute read Ross v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc., No. 1:21-CV-00206-MR-WCM, 2022 WL 4479968 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2022) By […]
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals found an attorney did not have standing to sue based on his receipt of a collection letter that incorrectly identified him as the attorney for an unaffiliated consumer. 09/20/2022 3:00 P.M. 3.5 minute read Magdy v. I.C. Sys., Inc., No. 21-3010, 2022 WL 4075764 (8th Cir. Sept. 6, 2022) […]
In a Hunstein-style case, the court found a consumer lacked Article III standing to pursue his claims that a debt collector violated the FDCPA when it shared his information with a third-party letter vendor. 05/20/2022 2:45 P.M. 3.5 minute read Patni v. Resurgent Cap. Servs., L.P., No. 21 C 2515, 2022 WL 1567069 (N.D. Ill. […]
In another Hunstein-styled letter vendor case, an Illinois district court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding the consumer sufficiently stated a claim at the pleadings stage of the case. 04/04/2022 3:30 P.M. 3.5 minute read Ali v. Credit Corp. Solutions, No. 21 C 5790, 2022 WL 986166 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 30, 2022) By Andrew […]