Preferred Collection’s Brief in Hunstein Argues Plaintiff Lacks Article III Standing, FDCPA Does Not Prohibit Communications With Agents

 

The court asked that the parties’ briefs focus on whether Hunstein had Article III standing to bring the FDCPA lawsuit in the letter-vendor case. Preferred Collection has asserted that Hunstein lacks standing because he has no injury in fact and argues that the now-vacated panel opinion ignored common-law agency principles and created a First Amendment […]

Read More…

Preferred Collection Files Brief in Hunstein FDCPA Case

Member Alert

 

01/18/2022 4:30 P.M. 2 minute read Today, Preferred Collection and Management Services Inc. filed its en banc brief in Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services Inc. (April 21, 2021). The appeal has become focused, in substantial part, on questions that surround the intersection of the federal judicial doctrine surrounding Article III standing, which relies […]

Read More…

Member Alert: 11th Circuit Panel Grants En Banc Hearing in Hunstein

News

 

10/17/2021 10:00 AM The grant for rehearing vacates the panel’s earlier opinion and leaves the ruling on letter vendors on hold until the next hearing. Tags/Topics: Hunstein FDCPA Member Alert News An en banc hearing request by Preferred Collection and Management Services Inc. in the Hunstein case has been approved. A majority of judges on the panel in Hunstein […]

Read More…