We’ve rounded up the most-read Daily Decisions of the year from ACA International’s compliance team.
12/22/2022 9:25 A.M.
3.5 minute read
You don’t need to be a lawyer with a Westlaw subscription to keep up with case law that impacts your business. ACA’s Daily Decisions are brief, reader-friendly summaries of industry-relevant legal decisions. Each day our compliance team selects cases to share—free—only with members. Check out the extensive library on our website and look for them in each issue of the ACA Daily e-newsletter.
As 2022 winds down, we dug into our online analytics to come up with the top 10 Daily Decisions that captivated our readers this year. The list features pivotal case decisions related to Hunstein, third-party letter vendors, medical debt credit reporting and more.
Enjoy this list of the year’s most-read Daily Decisions:
Although a court found a consumer alleged a sufficient risk of harm to establish standing, the court granted summary judgment for a collection agency based on the bona fide error defense.
By Betsy Clarke, July 12, 2022
A debt collector’s garnishment request without reasonable belief that the court has jurisdiction to grant it might be sufficient to violate the FDCPA.
By Betsy Clarke, May 4, 2022
An Illinois district court found that a medical bill that lacked certain disclosures required under the FDCPA was not subject to the act because the underlying debt was not in default when the defendant received the account.
By Andrew Pavlik, June 21, 2022
A New York district court held that the FCRA’s permissible purposes section was not limited to creditors because the act “allows a ‘person’ to access a report ‘in connection with a credit transaction.’”
By Andrew Pavlik, Nov. 29, 2022
An Arizona district court held that the defendants’ employee could be held directly liable under the TCPA because the plaintiff alleged that it was the employee himself who sent the text messages at issue.
By Andrew Pavlik, May 17, 2022
A Kansas district court held that verification of a debt under the FDCPA involves nothing more than the debt collector confirming in writing that the amount being demanded is what the creditor is claiming is owed.
By Andrew Pavlik, Dec. 15, 2022
The court found a consumer lacked standing to bring her claims under the FDCPA because temporary emotional discomfort such as nervousness or fear does not constitute a concrete injury.
By Betsy Clarke, Aug. 2, 2022
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s finding that a system that sent promotional text messages to phone numbers that were randomly selected from a database of customer information was not an ATDS under the TCPA.
By Andrew Pavlik, April 13, 2022
A court found a consumer plausibly alleged a violation of the FDCPA when it objected to a collection agency’s use of a third-party letter vendor. The court stated it had to assume Congress meant what it said and must enforce statutes that way.
By Betsy Clarke, June 14, 2022
The appellate court found that a collection letter advising a consumer that, because of the age of the debt, the collection agency would neither sue the consumer for it nor report it to a credit agency, did not violate the FDCPA because the consumer didn’t make a payment, promise to do so, or otherwise act to her detriment in response to anything in or omitted from the letter.
By Betsy Clarke, March 4, 2022
If you have executive leadership updates or other member news to share with ACA, contact our communications department at [email protected]. View our publications page for more information and our news submission guidelines here.