7/13/2021 8:00
Providing guidance on its earlier decision in Spokeo, the court held that a speculative risk of future harm to consumers as a result of misleading alerts in their credit files, which had not been disseminated to third-party businesses, did not supply basis for Article III standing to seek retrospective damages.
Tags/Topics: Article III Standing Concrete Injury
Access to this page is restricted.
Please log in.