Attorneys News

358 items listed - Back

An Overview of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 for Debt Collectors

A MAP member reviews the newly enacted financial regulatory reform legislation.

Aug 6, 2010

Startare v. Credit Bureau of N. Am., LLC

Section 1692c(c) of the FDCPA applies to communication with a consumer’s attorney.

Aug 6, 2010

Del Campo v. Am. Corrective Counseling Serv., Inc.

Individuals can be held personally liable as debt collectors under the FDCPA.

Aug 6, 2010

Howard v. Pinnacle Credit Servs., LLC

The scope of a “reasonable investigation” required by data furnishers is dependent upon the information provided in the consumer’s dispute.

Aug 6, 2010

Lesher v. Law Office of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.

A collection letter sent on attorney letterhead may violate the FDCPA if the attorney is not meaningfully involved in the collection of the account.

Aug 6, 2010

Leyse v. Bank of Am. Nat’l Ass’n

An unintended recipient of a telephone call does not have standing to bring an action under the TCPA. Only the “called party” has standing to bring an action under the TCPA.

Aug 6, 2010

Daley v. A & S Collection Assocs. Inc.

Providing a consumer reporting agency the wrong date of delinquency date is a violation of the FDCPA.

Aug 6, 2010

2010 MAP Conference Review

The newest MAP Committee Chair looks back on the recent 14th annual MAP Legal Education Conference.

Aug 6, 2010

MAP Announcements – New BOD, Committee Members, and Outgoing

MAP welcomes members to new positions and thanks outgoing members for their service.

Aug 6, 2010

FTC Releases Report on Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a report offering recommendations following its 2009 debt collection litigation and arbitration roundtables.

Aug 6, 2010

NCLC Releases Report on “The Debt Collection Machine”

The National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) published a report portraying the debt collection industry as a “debt collection machine.”

Aug 6, 2010

Law Enforcement Requests: Should Collection Agencies Always Comply?

The Georgia Supreme Court upheld a district court decision finding a request from the Governor’s Office of Consumer Affairs to provide documents for an investigation was an attempt to regulate the practice of law, which is prohibited in the state of Georgia.

Jul 2, 2010

Attorney Letterhead after Lesher

A recent court decision may significantly impact meaningful attorney representation challenges.

Jul 2, 2010

Update from the Ninth Circuit

Court rejects rehearing en banc in Pintos and opines on successful FDCPA defenses.

Jul 2, 2010

Peak v. Southern & Allen

It is not unlawful for a law firm authorized to file suit to mention an action the firm could take in a collection letter.

Jul 2, 2010